[ipv6hackers] IPv6 prefix changing

Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo carlosm3011 at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 19:08:34 CET 2012


Tks Owen !

On 3/7/12 3:52 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> It's not clear and I suspect will depend on the ISP.
>
> As SPZ noted, it appears some providers will use this as an excuse to extort additional funds from those wanting a static address. Of course you can always just get an HE Tunnel and get a static /48 if your provider is determined to be problematic.
>
> However, as much as we love people using our free tunnel service, we'd rather that ISPs did the right thing and such workarounds were unnecessary.
>
> I will say that many of our current tunnelbroker users are in Germany. At this time, all of our IPv6 assignments are static. Short of force of law, I don't anticipate that changing.
>
> Owen
>
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 7:35 AM, S.P.Zeidler wrote:
>
>> Thus wrote Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (carlosm3011 at gmail.com):
>>
>>> I agree that the opt-in would be best, however my question was more
>>> targetted at finding out what is actually possible. So I take that a
>>> procedure/ mechanism for opting-out of the dynamic assignment exists.
>> Of course. Order a business plan.
>>
>> regards,
>> 	spz
>> -- 
>> spz at serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ipv6hackers mailing list
>> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
> _______________________________________________
> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers



More information about the Ipv6hackers mailing list