[ipv6hackers] IPv6 security (slides and training)

Doug Barton dougb at dougbarton.us
Sat Nov 12 01:09:58 CET 2011

On 11/11/2011 16:05, Douglas Otis wrote:
> On 11/11/11 2:40 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> > I think that the IPv4 folks will quickly have problems
>> > communicating with
>> >> their partners and customers running IPv6.
>>  ... which is one of the big motivations to not be a first-mover to
>>  IPv6 in the first place.
> Doug,
> Disagree.  These partners also likely represent the land of
> opportunity.  Rather than receiving a growing portion of traffic over
> LSNs, offering IPv6 connectivity conveys better information when
> deciding which exchanges to permit.  In addition, direct access better
> prevents MitM and broken double NAT issues.

You guys keep missing the part where *I* agree with you.

The question isn't, "Is IPv6 the right answer?" The question is, "Why do
so many organizations believe that CGN is a better answer?"


		"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
		"Too practical."

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

More information about the Ipv6hackers mailing list