[ipv6hackers] SEND implementation Patent

Gert Doering gert at space.net
Wed Mar 14 11:25:41 CET 2012


On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:28:58PM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Because with other unsecured pieces, such as the DNS, SEND does not
> really make sense?
> Also, because many other systems do not implement it, either, so it
> doesn't pay much to be the first to do so?

Well, since Microsoft likes people to live in a closed world anyway,
and has the most of the needed CA infrastructure already in-place in 
their active directory environment, it would be fairly easy to add
SEND and "some sort of secure name resolution" to a Windows forest...

... and even good marketing: look, with Microsoft, your network is
much more secure than with Unix etc.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

More information about the Ipv6hackers mailing list