[ipv6hackers] "Stick to limited IPv6 deployments, businesses warned"
owend at he.net
Fri Sep 7 21:03:19 CEST 2012
On Sep 6, 2012, at 09:51 , Alastair Johnson <aj at sneep.net> wrote:
> On 6/09/2012, at 12:25 AM, Owen DeLong <owend at he.net> wrote:
>> What we need is to complete these solutions on all sides so operators can choose the set that best fits their environment.
> More or less agreed. As a vendor I'm not happy about doing 2x work, but religious and architectural beliefs are pushing that approach for now. I'm trying to be as complete as possible with both approaches, although it is always a juggling game.
Understood. There are environments where DHCP makes the most sense.
There are environments where SLAAC alone makes a lot of sense.
There are more environments where SLAAC+RDNSS actually makes the most sense, but it is unlikely that those environments would be well represented on this list. They are, however, the majority of real world deployments, contrary to what many of the members of this list would like to believe.
Feel free to contact me off list if you'd like more input.
More information about the Ipv6hackers