[ipv6hackers] IPv6 implications on IPv4 nets: IPv6 RAs, IPv4, and VPN "evasion"

Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net
Mon Sep 10 09:07:55 CEST 2012

On Sun, 9 Sep 2012, Fernando Gont wrote:

> On 09/09/2012 04:09 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>> -- the question is whether there are products that suffer from this
>>> problem... and, as noted by others, there are.
>> Right but unimplemented code doesn't need an RFC, it needs fixing by
>> vendors, as it's not about a fundamental underlying problem.
> I personally think it *is* a fundamental underlying problem: the fact
> that so far many VPNs only support IPv4, and due to the way IPv6 and
> IPv4 interact/co-exist, traffic may leak out of the VPN.

Yeah maybe, but is it much different from not supporting SeND (or
other ways) for example?   The technology exists, it's not used.


Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
          Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.

More information about the Ipv6hackers mailing list