[ipv6hackers] Happy eyeballs standards (was Re: Windows 7/2008 R2 Improved Resilliency to IPv6 Floods)

[Karl Auer]

On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 14:16 -0700, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
> I'd argue that the users (and application programmers) should at max have
> one switch to toggle: "This connection is part of an interactive response
> loop, complete it as soon as feasible".

Really? Then I won't be using your applications any time soon. And if
forced to, will hate you :-)

It is WAY too soon in the IPv6 cycle to start fossilising policy.

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
http://twitter.com/kauer389

GPG fingerprint: B862 FB15 FE96 4961 BC62 1A40 6239 1208 9865 5F9A
Old fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017