[ipv6hackers] Is there a telecom company which adpated IPv6 network on LTE?

[Luis MartinGarcia.]

In my opinion, the proper way to protect IPv6 clients that use global
scope addresses is to place stateful firewalls between the Internet and
them. NAT is not meant to provide security, even though everyone seems
to believe that.

Just my two cents.

Regards,

Luis MartinGarcia.



On 05/29/2013 08:27 AM, 김무성 wrote:
> One of advantage which deploy ipv6 network on telecom is that all smart-phone can have a public IPv6 address.
> But it cause security problem that hacker can attack smart-phone directly.
> If deploy a NAT6/6 or NAT6/4 device for security, availability of ipv6 is low
> And have to have ALG (Application Layer Gateway) device for providing service. (ex, SIP ALG for VoIP on LTE, etc)
>
> Is there a solution that use public IPv6 address on smart-phone and strengthen security?
> _______________________________________________
> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
>