[ipv6hackers] Zmap

Merike Kaeo merike at doubleshotsecurity.com
Sun Sep 1 19:44:14 CEST 2013


Also check out work by Richard Barnes and his colleagues:

http://www.caida.org/workshops/isma/1202/slides/aims1202_rbarnes.pdf

"Nothing's impossible only mathematically improbable" ( I think attributable to the Avengers) - the math changes as new mechanisms of intelligence are realized.

- merike


On Aug 31, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Joe Klein wrote:

> See my presentation I gave at gogonet last year.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Joe Klein
> Cell: (703) 594-1419
> jsklein at gmail.com
> 
> 
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:09 PM, <bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> people have been scanning the entire v4 address space for nearly two
>> decades.  (I think I was
>> the first to do an exaustive scan)  Zmap is fraught with the primary
>> problem of scanning, in
>> that it is -very- noticable and will be blocked by even semi-comatose
>> network admins.
>> 
>> For those of us in the research space, scanning v6 presents some novel
>> challanges.  v4 techniques
>> are not readily convertable to the v6 universe.  that said, there are a
>> couple of projects which
>> show promise for low cost, minimal impact scanning of IPv6.   We should
>> see early results
>> soon.
>> 
>> /bill
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:57:11PM +0000, Jim Small wrote:
>>> zmap is an interesting tool which allows scanning all public IPv4
>> addresses (IPv4 Internet) in about 45 minutes:
>>> https://zmap.io/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To quote from Tech Week Europe<
>> http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/zmap-internet-scan-zero-day-125374>:
>>> 
>>> The tool is only possible because the Internet is currently all squeezed
>> into the (comparatively) small IP version 4 (IPv4) address space, leaving
>> empty the much larger IP version 6 (IPv6) address space, where a brute
>> force scan would be impossible using current hardware.  "We are living in a
>> unique period", the researchers said in their talk. "IPv4 can be quickly,
>> exhaustively scanned - IPv6 has not yet been widely deployed."
>>> 
>>> I found this interesting because from a security vantage point you could
>> argue that IPv6 is superior in the sense that you can't brute force scan it
>> (Entire IPv6 Internet) whereas with IPv4 you can.  Do you think this
>> constitutes an IPv6 advantage?
>>> 
>>> --Jim
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ipv6hackers mailing list
>>> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
>>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ipv6hackers mailing list
>> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
> 




More information about the Ipv6hackers mailing list