[ipv6hackers] the end is near (or for IPv6: the beginning)
Schmoll, Carsten
carsten.schmoll at fokus.fraunhofer.de
Tue Jan 28 12:45:10 CET 2014
Dear Jim, all,
I'd kindly like to challenge the following statement, if only the "many" in it:
> NAT Challenges:
> * Many applications use embedded addresses which is broken by NAT
I'd like to learn which application are these (still). At a quick glance only the following ones come to my mind:
* active FTP
* SIP?
* XMPP?
* selected proprietary ones
Don't seem to be 'many' so far ...
Further to that, I am curious, which applications are currently limited and harmed by
> * Restricts inbound connections (obviously with many limitations)
or, asked vice versa, which ones would benefit most from direct end-to-end connectivity (where allowed)?
I can think of direct E2E/P2P in the form of audio(SIP/RTP), video, data (think e.g. torrents) transmission, but which one(s) would benefit/grow the most?
Best regards
Carsten
--
"With great power comes great responsibility! What power, you ask? UNIX root privileges."
Carsten Schmoll
Fraunhofer FOKUS
www.fokus.fraunhofer.de
More information about the Ipv6hackers
mailing list