[ipv6hackers] thc-ipv6 v3.0, IPv6 complexity and evasions
antonios.atlasis at gmail.com
Sat Oct 17 16:48:24 CEST 2015
On 17 October 2015 at 14:53, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 02:44:40PM +0200, Enno Rey wrote:
> > I will happily change my stance once I see an actual real-life ticket
> covering non-availability of a service based on filtering fragments which
> would have been needed for that service's functionality.
> The problem with this stance is that you add to other people's bills - DNS
> will fall back to TCP if UDP packets can't get through, but that causes
> more load to the server... so it will seem to "work", and you'll never
+ 1. Nevertheless, I always believed that when there is an issue with a
functionality, you fix the issue, you do not drop the functionality.
More information about the Ipv6hackers