[ipv6hackers] IPv6 prefix changing

Owen DeLong owend at he.net
Thu Mar 8 17:30:52 CET 2012


We do not offer dynamic addresses.

Owen

On Mar 8, 2012, at 2:42 AM, Markus Reschke wrote:

> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
> 
> Hi Owen!
> 
>> I will say that many of our current tunnelbroker users are in Germany. At this time, all of our IPv6 assignments are static. Short of force of law, I don't anticipate that changing.
> 
> Don't worry! There's no law about assigning dynamic IP addresses to private customers in Germany. If one likes to have static addresses and the ISP offers them, then there's no problem (but the money :-). The only thing I can think of is that the office for data privacy recommends dynamic addresses. Since static addresses can be tracked easily, nobody should be forced by the ISP to use them. Therefore the default should be dynamic addresses with the option to switch to static ones if requested by the customer. Anyway, a law forcing dynamic IP addresses would collide with the constitution, i.e. it would be invalid.
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> -- 
> / Markus Reschke \ / madires at theca-tabellaria.de \ / FidoNet 2:244/1661 \
> \                / \                             / \                    /
> _______________________________________________
> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers



More information about the Ipv6hackers mailing list