[ipv6hackers] "Stick to limited IPv6 deployments, businesses warned"
fgont at si6networks.com
Thu Aug 23 20:28:25 CEST 2012
On 08/23/2012 12:42 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> no, thats not the point. the point is that the implementations are
>> not where they should be for a global productional roleout.
> Neither is IPv4... That _IS_ the point. We rolled IPv4 out without
> worrying about it.
The world economy didn't depend on IPv4 when it was rolled out -- there
lies the "subtle" difference.
> The reality, however, is that snooping doesn't solve the problem, it
> just tells you that it is happening.
?? -- It blocks it.
> With RA Guard, we have an actual partial solution which, with some
> improved handling of Extension Headers and Fragments could become a
> complete solution.
Yet it was painful to move draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation forward.
v6 proponents (whatever that means :-) )don't like when v6 problems are
discussed... but they're also apathic when solutions to those problems
e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
More information about the Ipv6hackers