[ipv6hackers] "Stick to limited IPv6 deployments, businesses warned"
aj at sneep.net
Thu Sep 6 18:49:05 CEST 2012
On 5/09/2012, at 11:43 PM, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
>>> So we're pretty much writing off RDNSS? That what it seems like to me, but just confirming.
>> That's essentially writing off SLAAC which is, IMHO, a pretty bad thing.
> Disagree completely. SLAAC works today, without RDNSS. We don't see a
> compelling need for RDNSS here - and thus we're not asking our router
> vendors for such support.
As a router vendor, I am being asked for RDNSS support and it is on my roadmap.
More information about the Ipv6hackers