[ipv6hackers] "Stick to limited IPv6 deployments, businesses warned"

Jim Small jim.small at cdw.com
Fri Sep 7 14:30:13 CEST 2012

> >>> So we're pretty much writing off RDNSS?  That what it seems like to me,
> but just confirming.
> >>>
> >> That's essentially writing off SLAAC which is, IMHO, a pretty bad thing.
> >
> > Disagree completely. SLAAC works today, without RDNSS. We don't see a
> > compelling need for RDNSS here - and thus we're not asking our router
> > vendors for such support.
> As a router vendor, I am being asked for RDNSS support and it is on my
> roadmap.

What are the most compelling cases you've heard?


More information about the Ipv6hackers mailing list