[ipv6hackers] Is there a telecom company which adpated IPv6 network on LTE?

[Joe Klein]

Owen,

At on the east coast US, VZW is tunneling IPv6 and blocking many types of
IPv6 ICMP packets.

Joe Klein



On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Owen DeLong <owend at he.net> wrote:

>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On May 30, 2013, at 2:57 AM, 김무성 <disaster at sk.com> wrote:
>
> > Owen, what is your smartphone provider(ISP or telecom company)?
>
> VZW
>
> >
> > And, I think that push service is inbound traffic (internet ->
> smartphone)
> > If block any inbound traffic, we can use push service.
> > If smartphone has a public IPv6 address, because of attacker, because of
> inbound traffic, there is a incorrect billing.
>
> So far, I have not seen a problem.
>
> >
> > How do you think about this?
> >
>
> I suppose it's a potential issue, but is this different from any other
> metered internet service which allows inbound traffic?
>
> Owen
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ipv6hackers-bounces at lists.si6networks.com [mailto:
> ipv6hackers-bounces at lists.si6networks.com] On Behalf Of cb.list6
> > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:37 AM
> > To: IPv6 Hackers Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [ipv6hackers] Is there a telecom company which adpated IPv6
> network on LTE?
> >
> > On May 29, 2013 10:18 AM, "Owen DeLong" <owend at he.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> My smart phone is working perfectly fine with public IPv6 /64. So far,
> >> it
> > does not appear to be a security problem.
> >>
> >> I receive a /64. My IPv4 is NAT sometimes and sometimes public
> >> (depends
> > where I am located).
> >>
> >> I think the security issues are the same whether or not NAT.
> >>
> >> Owen
> >>
> >
> > My guess is that your mobile operator does stateful firewalling that
> disables any inbound connections, is that right?
> >
> > If so, any idea on how many state entries they allow you to create in
> their firewall for outbound flows?
> >
> > CB
> >
> >> On May 28, 2013, at 23:27 , 김무성 <disaster at sk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> One of advantage which deploy ipv6 network on telecom is that all
> > smart-phone can have a public IPv6 address.
> >>> But it cause security problem that hacker can attack smart-phone
> > directly.
> >>> If deploy a NAT6/6 or NAT6/4 device for security, availability of
> >>> ipv6
> > is low
> >>> And have to have ALG (Application Layer Gateway) device for
> >>> providing
> > service. (ex, SIP ALG for VoIP on LTE, etc)
> >>>
> >>> Is there a solution that use public IPv6 address on smart-phone and
> > strengthen security?
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> >>> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> >>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> >> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> >> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ipv6hackers mailing list
> > Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> > http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ipv6hackers mailing list
> > Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> > http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
> _______________________________________________
> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
>