[ipv6hackers] Is there a telecom company which adpated IPv6 network on LTE?

[cb.list6]

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Owen DeLong <owend at he.net> wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On May 30, 2013, at 2:57 AM, 김무성 <disaster at sk.com> wrote:
>
>> Owen, what is your smartphone provider(ISP or telecom company)?
>
> VZW
>

T-Mobile USA also allows inbound IPv6 connections.  Perhaps
"end-to-end IPv6 connectivity"  is now a de facto standard, ask for it
by name :)


CB
>>
>> And, I think that push service is inbound traffic (internet -> smartphone)
>> If block any inbound traffic, we can use push service.
>> If smartphone has a public IPv6 address, because of attacker, because of inbound traffic, there is a incorrect billing.
>
> So far, I have not seen a problem.
>
>>
>> How do you think about this?
>>
>
> I suppose it's a potential issue, but is this different from any other metered internet service which allows inbound traffic?
>
> Owen
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ipv6hackers-bounces at lists.si6networks.com [mailto:ipv6hackers-bounces at lists.si6networks.com] On Behalf Of cb.list6
>> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:37 AM
>> To: IPv6 Hackers Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [ipv6hackers] Is there a telecom company which adpated IPv6 network on LTE?
>>
>> On May 29, 2013 10:18 AM, "Owen DeLong" <owend at he.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> My smart phone is working perfectly fine with public IPv6 /64. So far,
>>> it
>> does not appear to be a security problem.
>>>
>>> I receive a /64. My IPv4 is NAT sometimes and sometimes public
>>> (depends
>> where I am located).
>>>
>>> I think the security issues are the same whether or not NAT.
>>>
>>> Owen
>>>
>>
>> My guess is that your mobile operator does stateful firewalling that disables any inbound connections, is that right?
>>
>> If so, any idea on how many state entries they allow you to create in their firewall for outbound flows?
>>
>> CB
>>
>>> On May 28, 2013, at 23:27 , 김무성 <disaster at sk.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> One of advantage which deploy ipv6 network on telecom is that all
>> smart-phone can have a public IPv6 address.
>>>> But it cause security problem that hacker can attack smart-phone
>> directly.
>>>> If deploy a NAT6/6 or NAT6/4 device for security, availability of
>>>> ipv6
>> is low
>>>> And have to have ALG (Application Layer Gateway) device for
>>>> providing
>> service. (ex, SIP ALG for VoIP on LTE, etc)
>>>>
>>>> Is there a solution that use public IPv6 address on smart-phone and
>> strengthen security?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ipv6hackers mailing list
>>>> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
>>>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ipv6hackers mailing list
>>> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
>>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ipv6hackers mailing list
>> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ipv6hackers mailing list
>> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
> _______________________________________________
> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers