[ipv6hackers] Is there a telecom company which adpated IPv6 network on LTE?

Owen DeLong owend at he.net
Thu May 30 17:15:50 CEST 2013



Sent from my iPad

On May 30, 2013, at 2:57 AM, 김무성 <disaster at sk.com> wrote:

> Owen, what is your smartphone provider(ISP or telecom company)?

VZW

> 
> And, I think that push service is inbound traffic (internet -> smartphone)
> If block any inbound traffic, we can use push service.
> If smartphone has a public IPv6 address, because of attacker, because of inbound traffic, there is a incorrect billing.

So far, I have not seen a problem.

> 
> How do you think about this?
> 

I suppose it's a potential issue, but is this different from any other metered internet service which allows inbound traffic?

Owen

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6hackers-bounces at lists.si6networks.com [mailto:ipv6hackers-bounces at lists.si6networks.com] On Behalf Of cb.list6
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:37 AM
> To: IPv6 Hackers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [ipv6hackers] Is there a telecom company which adpated IPv6 network on LTE?
> 
> On May 29, 2013 10:18 AM, "Owen DeLong" <owend at he.net> wrote:
>> 
>> My smart phone is working perfectly fine with public IPv6 /64. So far, 
>> it
> does not appear to be a security problem.
>> 
>> I receive a /64. My IPv4 is NAT sometimes and sometimes public 
>> (depends
> where I am located).
>> 
>> I think the security issues are the same whether or not NAT.
>> 
>> Owen
>> 
> 
> My guess is that your mobile operator does stateful firewalling that disables any inbound connections, is that right?
> 
> If so, any idea on how many state entries they allow you to create in their firewall for outbound flows?
> 
> CB
> 
>> On May 28, 2013, at 23:27 , 김무성 <disaster at sk.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> One of advantage which deploy ipv6 network on telecom is that all
> smart-phone can have a public IPv6 address.
>>> But it cause security problem that hacker can attack smart-phone
> directly.
>>> If deploy a NAT6/6 or NAT6/4 device for security, availability of 
>>> ipv6
> is low
>>> And have to have ALG (Application Layer Gateway) device for 
>>> providing
> service. (ex, SIP ALG for VoIP on LTE, etc)
>>> 
>>> Is there a solution that use public IPv6 address on smart-phone and
> strengthen security?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ipv6hackers mailing list
>>> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
>>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ipv6hackers mailing list
>> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
>> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
> _______________________________________________
> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
> _______________________________________________
> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers



More information about the Ipv6hackers mailing list