[ipv6hackers] IETF I-D: "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers" (Fwd: [v6ops] WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops)

Fernando Gont fgont at si6networks.com
Tue Oct 20 20:32:28 UTC 2020


Folks,

A Working Group Last Call (WGLC) has been started for our IETF I-D 
"Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers" 
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-01) 
-- You can find the WGLC call below.

If you have comments, please do send them to the mailing-list, if 
possible (https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops).

If not possible (?) :-), I'd still welcome them unicast to me, or on 
this list if you feel like publicly discussing the topic here.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Fernando




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [v6ops] WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:35:34 -0700
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf at gmail.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops at ietf.org>

I'm opening a two week WGLC on 
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-01.txt. This draft started in 
2015, and was set aside for a while. We took it as a working group draft 
in July with some additional authors, it has been recently updated in 
response to issues raised, and the question before the house is whether 
it is ready for archival state - to become an RFC. There are a number of 
questions:
   - do we agree with the language? (there are probably nits to be 
cleaned up)
   - do we agree with the concepts as stated?
   - do we agree with the direction the draft takes us?

I think the draft could use a thorough review, and having said that, am 
asking for volunteers. You don't have to tell me, per se; do the review 
and post it to the mailing list.

Two weeks gets us to November 2.
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops



More information about the Ipv6hackers mailing list