[ipv6hackers] IETF I-D: "Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers" (Fwd: [v6ops] WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops)
Fernando Gont
fgont at si6networks.com
Tue Oct 20 20:32:28 UTC 2020
Folks,
A Working Group Last Call (WGLC) has been started for our IETF I-D
"Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers"
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-01)
-- You can find the WGLC call below.
If you have comments, please do send them to the mailing-list, if
possible (https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops).
If not possible (?) :-), I'd still welcome them unicast to me, or on
this list if you feel like publicly discussing the topic here.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Fernando
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [v6ops] WGLC on draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:35:34 -0700
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf at gmail.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops at ietf.org>
I'm opening a two week WGLC on
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-01.txt. This draft started in
2015, and was set aside for a while. We took it as a working group draft
in July with some additional authors, it has been recently updated in
response to issues raised, and the question before the house is whether
it is ready for archival state - to become an RFC. There are a number of
questions:
- do we agree with the language? (there are probably nits to be
cleaned up)
- do we agree with the concepts as stated?
- do we agree with the direction the draft takes us?
I think the draft could use a thorough review, and having said that, am
asking for volunteers. You don't have to tell me, per se; do the review
and post it to the mailing list.
Two weeks gets us to November 2.
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
More information about the Ipv6hackers
mailing list