[ipv6hackers] Is there a telecom company which adpated IPv6 network on LTE?

[cb.list6]

On May 29, 2013 10:18 AM, "Owen DeLong" <owend at he.net> wrote:
>
> My smart phone is working perfectly fine with public IPv6 /64. So far, it
does not appear to be a security problem.
>
> I receive a /64. My IPv4 is NAT sometimes and sometimes public (depends
where I am located).
>
> I think the security issues are the same whether or not NAT.
>
> Owen
>

My guess is that your mobile operator does stateful firewalling that
disables any inbound connections, is that right?

If so, any idea on how many state entries they allow you to create in their
firewall for outbound flows?

CB

> On May 28, 2013, at 23:27 , 김무성 <disaster at sk.com> wrote:
>
> > One of advantage which deploy ipv6 network on telecom is that all
smart-phone can have a public IPv6 address.
> > But it cause security problem that hacker can attack smart-phone
directly.
> > If deploy a NAT6/6 or NAT6/4 device for security, availability of ipv6
is low
> > And have to have ALG (Application Layer Gateway) device for providing
service. (ex, SIP ALG for VoIP on LTE, etc)
> >
> > Is there a solution that use public IPv6 address on smart-phone and
strengthen security?
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ipv6hackers mailing list
> > Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> > http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ipv6hackers mailing list
> Ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers