[ipv6hackers] IPv6 Addressing Plan Hints?

[de =?iso-8859-1?q?Br=FCn?=, Markus]

Hi Johannes,

I know two documents: one by surfnet (english) and one by BSI (german).
http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/training/material/IPv6-for-LIRs-Training-Course/Preparing-an-IPv6-Addressing-Plan.pdf
https://www.bsi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/BSI/Internetsicherheit/isi_lana_studie_pdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

Regards,
Markus




__________ ursprüngliche Nachricht __________

Von:		Johannes Weber <johannes at webernetz.net>
Datum:	Dienstag, 7. Januar 2014, 16:00:52
An:		ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
Kopie:	
Betr.:	[ipv6hackers] IPv6 Addressing Plan Hints?

> Hello everybody,
>
> our team is currently planning an IPv6 address
> scheme and would like to know if there are any guidelines and best
> practices out there?
> E.g.,
> - basic scheme for the subnet IDs, such as
> "site", "security-zone", "actual subnets", ...
> - how do you allocate
> "preserved" bits into the address scheme?
> - does a worldwide company use
> its single prefix and routes it through tunnels to other sites
> (bandwidth, latency, ...) or does it use different prefixes on every
> site? Or does it propagate subsets of its PI-space from different ASs?
> Or from the same AS which is splitted?
>
> Are there any guidelines for
> handling the host IDs? Such as using a portion of the host ID for the
> "type of machine" such as router, server, firewall, etc.?
>
> Thanks in
> advance!
>
> Johannes